| THE DEVELOPMENT OFF EAGRY now known as EAGRY GARDENS |
|---|
| PLANS DIFFER | |
|
|
| Because of so many different versions, we wrote to the Divisional Planning
Manager on 18th March 2004 asking what Layout Plan/Drawing number was finally
approved by Planning Service and taken to Moyle Council in November 2003?
. We have subsequently (7/4/04) received a reply
stating the approved plan was drawing no. 02/55:02 (30th May 2003).
Would we have been told this was the approved plan if we had sat back and not
enquired?
BUT THIS PLAN HAS NEVER
BEEN PUBLICLY ADVERTISED AS AN AMENDED PLAN! |
|
|
|
| Looking
at the "approved" plan, - of the 26 proposed new dwellings which
directly abut onto the established Eagry
dwellings, 21 of them have been changed from the published version.
(17 moved nearer and four moved further
away) Here are a couple of examples:- A proposed semi detached 2-storey house has been moved a third nearer (4m) to the boundary of an existing Eagry bungalow. And what of the smaller alterations? The change of a metre here or there might be viewed as "fine tuning" but with buildings in such close quarters, measurements are vital. Spare a thought for an existing Eagry bungalow that has had a proposed 2-storey house moved yet another metre nearer to the boundary making it now less than 4 metres away. (That's about 13 feet) This
plan (dwg
02/55:02), which includes these changes has never been advertised
as an
amended plan
in the local Press. On 18th Of April 2004 we wrote to the Divisional Planning Manager, pointing out all these differences and asking that the "approved" plan should be re-advertised. We had no reply, not even an acknowledgement. So four weeks later we sent another copy, only this time requiring a signature on delivery. We quickly received an acknowledgement this time |
|
|
|
On 28 May 2004 the Case Officer wrote to the Divisional Planner Manager, on our behalf, asking if ... "Planning Service was in a position to comment on Mr and Mrs Willis's letter dated 18th April" (i.e. our concerns re the huge number of differences in the unadvertised plans).As far as we know he never did get a reply. Our request was ignored. The amended plan has not been advertised but instead given the go-ahead. See next page for list of changes and the reply by the Divisional
Planning Manager when we queried why none of this was advertised...
you'll be surprised. On second thoughts you probably wont be. |
|